The result? All the doggy testers were able to finish their meals quicker with a stainless steel bowl than a plastic one. The only downside to stainless steel slow feeders is that metal is harder to work with than plastic, which means the patterns found on these slow feeders are much simpler than those made from plastic. Perfect for those unstoppable chewers who have to gnaw on everything in sight. Not only are they easy to clean, but they are virtually indestructible. There are many reasons why dog owners prefer stainless steel to plastic. Plastic recommendations? Maybe a stainless steel slow feeder is what you need. They could easily lick out the wet food from every nook and cranny, which was something they struggled to do with slow-feed bowls having more complicated designs.Īs for water, the wider, open spaces made it so that our testers could easily scoop up water with their tongue with minimal splashes and spills. Our testers also saw an advantage to this. In fact, this plastic slow feeder was best suited for these types of foods.įor wet foods, the less complicated design allowed me to easily spread the food around the bowl. The one major advantage that the Dogit Go Slow had over our top pick is its suitability for wet foods and liquids. Unfortunately, the opening at the bottom of the feeder meant that dogs could accidentally slide their foot under the bowl and flip it. The non-skid base worked wonderfully, preventing the slow feeder from moving around during feeding. However, the edges of the bowl and ridges on the inside made it too difficult for Olivia, our flat-faced dog, to reach the food. I found the product to be sturdy and well-designed. The Dogit Go Slow Bowl comes in a single design, available in four different sizes ranging from extra small to large. If you have never used a slow feeder before, I highly suggest starting with this one.ĭogit comes in at a very close second with a great-performing slow feeder. The pattern on the purple bowl featured lower ridges and shallow valleys and was the only style that every dog we tested with could comfortably and confidently eat from. I found that one design, in particular, was suited for the widest range of dogs – big, small and flat-faced… Once feeding time is over, the Fun Feeder Slo-Bowl is easily cleaned with a trip through the dishwasher (top rack only!).Ĭan’t figure out which style of Slo-Bowl is right for your dog? I would feel comfortable eating out of this bowl myself if the situation arises! I was particularly impressed that food-safe plastic is used – no BPA, PVC or phthalates. The solid construction becomes particularly apparent when compared with other slow-feed bowls on the market. Even our most excited dogs were able to eat their meal without food spilling. The non-slip base stopped the bowls from sliding around at mealtime and performed well on all surfaces. I can confidently answer that with a solidĪll four styles of the bowl performed well, considerably increasing the amount of time it took our doggy testers to finish their food. With four different styles and two sizes, Outward Hound offers something for big, small and flat-faced dogs – something that no other brand delivered.ĭoes the Fun Feeder Slo-Bowl live up to the hype? I suspect that part of the reason for the popularity is that the Fun Feeder Slo-Bowl by Outward Hound is suitable for a broad range of dogs. During our research, it was the most recommended slow feeder by dog users and store owners alike. To say this slow feeder is popular is an understatement.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |